Comparing 9, the short, and 9 the full-length movie

 Short Film: For the brief duration of the film, it truly captured my interest. Plot development happened swiftly. From the outset, the place and background were easily discernible. It was possible for us to observe the character development and goals. The conflict was presented nearly right away. This was a brief film, so this was to be expected; it was direct to the point. While there were a few special effects thrown in, transitioning between phases and finishing the "full cycle" was the primary goal. 


Full length film: Because of this, over the entire feature film, "9" and the other stitch punks each have unique personalities and positions within the group, and their relationships with one another change. The lengthier duration of the film makes this possible. Otherwise, this would not be feasible. Motion capture technology was employed in the film's special effects to produce lifelike motions and facial expressions, making them noteworthy. The short and feature-length films both exhibit the director's aesthetic. Its hand-drawn style and use of subdued hues demonstrate this. "9" adheres to the tropes of the post-apocalyptic science fiction subgenre. Both the short and feature-length films were supposed to clearly illustrate this. 

Comparison of both films: What we learned from this comparison is that the films are pretty comparable, but the full-length film has more detail and what we described as “more of everything”. However, they both operate on the same principles all along.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Production Blog: Filming Tomorrow

Short Film Research: Don't Move

Planning Blog: Storyboard